U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz highlights the chilling impact of Marco Rubio's dubious rationale for deporting students whose views offend him.
But now his case against the government can move forward.
Those accused of wrongdoing have the right to challenge the evidence against them before the government takes away their liberty.
The case against Michelino Sunseri exemplifies the injustice caused by the proliferation of regulatory crimes—the target of a recent presidential order.
Vicki Baker's legal odyssey is finally coming to an end.
Without such intervention, he warns, the government "could snatch anyone off the street, turn him over to a foreign country, and then effectively foreclose any corrective course of action."
The president's crusade against attorneys whose work offends him, which defies the First Amendment and undermines the right to counsel, has provoked several judicial rebukes.
Two of his targets are seeking permanent injunctions against the president's blatantly unconstitutional executive orders.
The Supreme Court unanimously rejected that claim, upholding the right to due process in deportation cases.
This case has crucial implications for the ability of migrants to effectively challenge illegal AEA deportations.
Although the Court lifted an order that temporarily blocked removal of suspected gang members, it unambiguously affirmed their right to judicial review.
Linda Martin's lawsuit alleges that the agency violated her right to due process when it took her $40,200 and sent her a notice failing to articulate the reason.
The people deported are incarcerated in Salvadoran prisons without any due process whatsoever.
A recently filed amicus brief in Fuld v. PLO.
If the Consumer Product Safety Commission doesn't have enough data to enact a rule, it shouldn't be making informal recommendations either.
A local government gave ownership of Kevin Fair's Nebraska house—and all of its value—to a private investor, in a practice known as home equity theft.
A Utica, New York, land grab offers the justices an opportunity to revisit a widely criticized precedent.
The case gives the Supreme Court an opportunity to revisit a widely reviled decision that invited such eminent domain abuses.
Whether or not the government is required under the 5th Amendment to pay such victims will remain an open question.
Without a warrant and specific proof of incriminating evidence, police should never be allowed past your phone’s lock screen.
A handful of states use loopholes to get around a Supreme Court ruling that declared the practice unconstitutional.
Two brothers are asking the Supreme Court to stop their town from using eminent domain to steal their land for an empty field.
The outrageous seizure at the center of Rebel Ridge resembles real-life cash grabs.
Kevin Fair fell behind on his property taxes in 2014. The local government eventually gave a private investor the deed to his home.
Harold Medina made that argument during an internal investigation of a car crash he caused last February.
The Edmondson Community Organization accrued a modest property tax debt. The group paid dearly for that.
By targeting "persons undermining peace, security, and stability," the plaintiffs argue, the president is threatening to punish people for opposing a two-state solution.
North Carolina taxpayers have already spent over $96 million on the site, while state officials have seized multiple private properties.
Chelsea Koetter is asking the Michigan Supreme Court to render the state's debt collection scheme unconstitutional.
Paul Erlinger was sentenced to 15 years in prison based largely on a determination made by a judge—not a jury.
Prosecutor Ralph Petty was also employed as a law clerk—by the same judges he argued before.
Mollie and Michael Slaybaugh are reportedly out over $70,000. The government says it is immune.
The Show Me State has plenty of room to rein in laws on taking private property, but instead, lawmakers are focusing only on one very narrow use case.
Angela Prichard was murdered after Bellevue police officers repeatedly refused to enforce a restraining order against her abusive husband.
The 9th Circuit determined that forcibly mashing a suspect's thumb into his phone to unlock it was akin to fingerprinting him at the police station.
The push to regulate social media content infringes on rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
Kristy Kay Money and Rolf Jacob Sraubhaar are now suing the city of San Marcos, Texas, saying they're being forced to keep a Klan-linked symbol on the front of their house is a physical taking.
His lawyers assert presidential immunity and discretion, criticize an "unconstitutionally vague" statute, and question the special counsel's legal status.
An error-prone investigation in search of a fugitive led police to Amy Hadley's house.
In this case, an LA SWAT team destroyed an innocent store owner's shop in the process of trying to catch a suspect.
Carlos Pena's livelihood has been crippled. It remains to be seen if he'll have any right to compensation.
Legal scholar Julie Suk argues the answer is "yes." The idea has a solid basis in natural rights theory, but is at odds with longstanding legal doctrine. It also has potentially very broad libertarian implications.
"The taxpayer must render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, but no more," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts.
A win for Geraldine Tyler, who is now 94 years old, would be a win for property rights.
Although the law did not change, regulators suddenly decided to criminalize unregistered possession of braced pistols.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
