Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Social Media

Mark Zuckerberg Blames Biden for 'Government Pressure' To Censor Facebook

The Meta CEO says his platforms will not blindly obey the bureaucrats again.

Robby Soave | 8.27.2024 3:21 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Mark Zuckerberg at a congressional hearing | CNP/AdMedia/Newscom
Mark Zuckerberg (CNP/AdMedia/Newscom)

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg told the House Judiciary Committee that his company's moderators faced significant pressure from the federal government to censor content on Facebook and Instagram—and that he regretted caving to it. In a letter to Rep. Jim Jordan (R–Ohio), the committee's chairman, Zuckerberg explained that the pressure also applied to "humor and satire" and that in the future, Meta would not blindly obey the bureaucrats.

"I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it," wrote Zuckerberg. "We're ready to pushback if something like this happens again."

The letter refers specifically to the widespread suppression of contrarian viewpoints relating to COVID-19. As I detailed in the cover story for Reason's March 2023 issue, federal bureaucrats pushed Facebook and Instagram to take down content that could theoretically contribute to vaccine hesitancy. President Joe Biden accused Meta of "killing people" by failing to moderate vaccine-skeptical content more aggressively. Eventually, the social media giant outsourced COVID-19 moderation to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), leading to a vast crackdown on speech.

Email exchanges between Facebook moderators and CDC officials reveal that the government took a heavy hand in suppressing content. Health officials did not merely vet posts for accuracy but also made pseudo-scientific determinations about whether certain opinions could cause social "harm" by undermining the effort to encourage all Americans to get vaccinated. The CDC took the position that expressing skepticism about vaccinating children—most of whom are not at risk of a negative COVID-19 outcome—was a form of misinformation and should be policed.

"In 2021, senior officials from the Biden Administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire," wrote Zuckerberg.

But COVID-19 content was not the only kind of speech the government went after. Zuckerberg also explains that the FBI warned him about Russian attempts to sow chaos on social media by releasing a fake story about the Biden family just before the 2020 election. This warning motivated Facebook to take action against the New York Post's Hunter Biden laptop story when it was published in October 2020. In his letter, Zuckerberg states that this was a mistake and that moving forward, Facebook will never again demote stories pending approval from fact-checkers.

"We've changed our policies and processes to make sure this doesn't happen again," wrote Zuckerberg.

This news will likely fail to reassure many conservatives who still blame Zuckerberg personally for what transpired. But the evidence is now overwhelming that the federal pressure campaign—not the politics of the moderators themselves—was the most important reason for heavy-handed content suppression on social media sites. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court declined to remedy this situation and prohibit federal bureaucrats from jawboning the platforms.

This means that supporters of free speech will have to rely on the inclinations of the tech giants to stand up to the federal government. It's a very good thing, then, that Zuckerberg no longer wants his social media platform to be beholden to the White House.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Florida Police Officer Arrested and Charged in Fatal Shooting of 23-Year-Old Airman Roger Fortson

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Social MediaBiden AdministrationFacebookMark ZuckerbergCoronavirusJoe BidenFederal governmentPandemicCensorship
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (143)

Latest

How Freedom Lovers Can Reckon with Addicts and Addiction

Daniel Akst | 6.15.2025 7:00 AM

Ross Douthat on Digital Alienation, Birth Rates, and Demographic Collapse

Liz Wolfe and Zach Weissmueller | From the July 2025 issue

More Than 1,800 'No Kings' Protests Aim for Nonviolent Pushback Against Trump Policies

Nancy Rommelmann | 6.14.2025 10:10 AM

Have Presidents Grown Too Powerful To Be Removed From Office?

Gene Healy | 6.14.2025 8:00 AM

Some Federal Agencies Are Actually Getting More Efficient

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 6.14.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!